USPTO serial 87678894
TEASPRESSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEDMAN, CORI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEASPRESSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L Shapiro
MARY L SHAPIRO EVOKE LAW, PC244 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 507SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring brewed tea, unbrewed tea, and tea accessories; Subscription based order fulfillment services in the field of tea | ABANDONED | Oct 12, 2015 |
| 043 | Preparation of tea, coffee, and other coffee- and tea-based beverages; Catering of drinks; Providing information in the nature of recipes for drinks and cooking | ABANDONED | Feb 11, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | CU.M | CONCURRENT USE DISSOLVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |