USPTO serial 87687220
TRUECREDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAINTER, VALERIYA SHERMAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUECREDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia K. Sutherland
Julia K. Sutherland Seyfarth Shaw LLPSuite 8000233 S. Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing financial information, data and reports in the field of consumer credit, credit scores and credit reports by means of the Internet; Providing online credit scoring and evaluation services; Providing online credit reporting services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing non-downloadable software for accessing information pertaining to consumer credit, fraud and identity theft, credit reports, credit monitoring, and locking credit information; Providing a web-based digital platform providing access to information pertaining to consumer credit, fraud and identity theft, credit reports, credit monitoring, and locking credit information; Electronic monitoring of credit reports to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud via the Internet; Providing information in the field of electronic credit monitoring to detect fraud via the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |