Drawing for EFFERVESCENCE

USPTO serial 87688192

EFFERVESCENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFFERVESCENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Hochman

David Hochman Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin LLP11400 W. Olympic Blvd. 9th Fl.LOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic downloadable workbooks for the study of wine, champagne, alcohol beverages and food productsACTIVE
016Printed curriculum materials, namely, printed instructional and teaching materials for the study of wine, champagne, alcohol beverages and food productsACTIVE
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, hosting social entertainment events featuring champagne, wine and food; organizing tasting competitions featuring champagne, wine and food; Educational and entertainment services, namely, hosting galas in the nature of social entertainment events featuring champagne, wine and food; providing lectures, seminars and workshops featuring information about champagne, wine and food tastings; entertainment services, namely, live performances by musical artist and artists; Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing reality based television series; providing online non-downloadable workbooks for the study of wine, champagne, alcohol beverages and food productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 11, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 29, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 20, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 20, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 20, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 20, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 20, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 15, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 15, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 15, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 15, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 15, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 4, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 3, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance