USPTO serial 87708759
NEOLITH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEOLITH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Home and Offices furniture. kitchen furniture; bathroom furniture; outdoor furniture; mirrors being looking glasses; furniture frames; picture frames. Ceramic knobs and glass knobs; Ceramic pulls; Ceramic pulls for cabinets, drawers and furniture; Containers for transport, not of metal; Dining chairs; Dining room tables; Dining tables; Door handles, not of metal; Door knockers not of metal; Door nameplates, not of metal; Fireplace screens; Frames for paintings; Furniture; Furniture for displaying goods; Furniture in the nature of sectionals; Furniture partitions; Furniture parts; Furniture, namely, showcases; Furniture, namely, wall units; Gate hardware, namely, non-metal gate latches; Kitchen cabinets; Kitchen furniture, namely, ready to assemble mobile kitchen islands; Kitchen-type cabinets for outdoor use; Marble tables; Mirror frames; Office furniture; Porcelain doorknobs; Porcelain knobs; Porcelain pulls; Sink liners; Window fasteners, not of metal; Window fittings, not of metal; Window stops, not of metal or rubber; Work benches; Work surfaces; Bamboo blinds; Bathroom furniture; Bedroom furniture; Book holders; Buffets; Cabinets; Cabinets being furniture for kitchen; Clips, not of metal, for cables and pipes; Custom furniture; Decorative window finials; Entertainment centers; Fabric window blinds; Fitted kitchen furniture; Fitted fabric furniture covers; Fitted furniture covers not of fabric; Freestanding partitions; Furniture frames; Furniture moldings; Furniture partitions of wood; Furniture primarily of metal, namely, mirrors, bed frames, dining tables, coffee tables, end tables, desks, display cases, shelving, dog gates, and baby gates; Hardware, namely, non-metal brackets for general use; Indoor window blinds being shades; Interior window blinds; Interior window coverings, namely, vertical and horizontal louvers; Interior window shades; Interior textile window blinds; Library furniture; Living room furniture; Lounge furniture; Mats, removable, for sinks; Metal indoor window blinds; Mirrors; Moldings for picture frames; Movable wall partitions; Non-metal cable clips; Non-metal clamps; Non-metal door bolts; Non-metal door fittings; Non-metal door latches; Non-metal door trims; Non-metal fasteners, namely, bolts, nails, rivets, screws; Non-metal fastening anchors; Non-metal gate stops; Non-metal hanging closet organizers for clothing; Non-metal knobs; Non-metal name plates; Non-metal window trims; Non-metal cable clamps; Non-metal clips for fastening pairs of socks for laundering; Non-metal mounting brackets for general use; Non-metal pulls; Non-metal sash fasteners for windows; Non-metal threaded fasteners; Nonmetal door and window hardware, namely, keys, guards and clasps; Picture frames; Plastic name badges; Seating furniture; Table tops; Upholstered furniture | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |