Drawing for UNMASKED

USPTO serial 87726027

UNMASKED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARMON, RAYMOND E
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNMASKED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine M.C. Farrelly

Catherine M.C. Farrelly FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC28 Liberty StreetNew York, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of live stage performances in the nature of musical theater productions in the fields of music, theatrical productions, the life and career of a musical composer, and the history and creation of a musical composers shows; Production of television programmes and films in the fields of the music, theatrical productions, the life and career of a musical composer, and the history and creation of a musical composers showsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 8, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2023EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 26, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2022ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 25, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 29, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance