USPTO serial 87760095
SUPER NATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2021
- Examiner
- HOLLAND, JAMI ELENA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SUPER NATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osborne Park, WA, AU
Osborne Park, WA, AU
Osborne Park, WA, AU
MENTONE, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Lantz
Jennifer M. Lantz Duane Morris LLP260 Homer Avenue, Suite 202Palo Alto, CA 94301United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen, chilled, or freeze-dried prepared meals consisting principally of fish; Frozen, chilled, or freeze-dried prepared meals consisting principally of meat; Frozen, chilled, or freeze-dried prepared meals consisting principally of poultry; Frozen, chilled, or freeze-dried prepared meals consisting principally of vegetables; Prepared meals consisting principally of fish; Prepared meals consisting principally of meat; Prepared meals consisting principally of poultry; Prepared meals consisting principally of seafood; Prepared meals consisting principally of tofu; Prepared meals consisting principally of vegetables; Dahls, namely, dried lentils; Chilled or frozen soups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Noodle-based prepared meals; Prepared meals consisting principally of pasta; Prepared meals consisting principally of rice; Frozen, chilled, or freeze-dried meals consisting primarily of pasta; Frozen, chilled, or freeze-dried meals consisting primarily of rice; frozen, chilled, or freeze-dried meals made predominantly from rice, pasta or noodles; Polenta; Processed quinoa; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for soups; Frozen or chilled pizzas; pizzas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vesco Foods Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Vesco Foods Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Vesco Foods Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by PATTIES FOODS PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SUPER NATURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2026 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |