USPTO serial 87784849
URBANMOD.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEHMER, JASON ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URBANMOD.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Harris
Richard D. Harris Greenberg Traurig, LLP77 W. Wacker DriveSuite 3100Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | (Based on Intent to Use) Art prints on canvas; art pictures on canvas; framed graphic art reproductions; framed art pictures; framed art prints; framed paintings; wall stickers; murals | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Furniture, namely, beds, dining chairs, lounge chairs, coffee tables, console tables, mattresses, side tables, chairs, arm chairs, dining tables, deck chairs, love seats, outdoor chairs, outdoor tables, furniture shelves, sofas, stools, seats; outdoor seating, namely, sofas; sculptures made of poly-resin; sculptures made of plastic; benches; dressers; mirrors; ottomans; bed pillows; accent pillows; television stands; nightstands | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2016 |
| 021 | (Based on Intent to Use) Vases; bowls; candle holders; planters for flowers and plants; ceramic sculptures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |