USPTO serial 87816016
BSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- INGRAM, KYLE G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David D. Postolski
DAVID D POSTOLSKI GEARHART LAW LLCINNOVATION PLAZA 41 RIVER ROADSUMMIT, NJ 07901UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | TTPR | BOARD DECISION SET ASIDE; PROCEEDING REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |