USPTO serial 87864184
SRI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZARICK, DIANA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SRI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Robinson
James R. Robinson ROBINSON LAW OFFICE, PLLC7 Alhaja LaneHot Springs Village, AR 71909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing online services, namely, a website featuring business information in the field of sales and sales performance analysis, development of sales strategies, sales measurement, sales capability and sales enablement | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in measuring sales capability | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2022 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2018 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |