USPTO serial 87901153
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T. Wang
TIMOTHY T. WANG NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC8140 WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 500DALLAS, TX 75231UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Handbags; briefcases; garment bags for travel; umbrellas; travelling trunks; leather, unworked or semi-worked; purses; rucksacks; business card cases; leather thongs for fastening or securing items; mountaineering sticks;all-purpose carrying bags; key cases; unfitted furniture coverings of leather; collars for animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bath mitts; cord fabric for curtains; washcloth; bed linen; shower curtains of textile or plastic; place mats of textile; curtains of textile or plastic; felt; shrouds; handkerchiefs of textile; pillow-cover towel; household linen; sleeping bags, namely, bed sheets for sleeping bags; woven fabric of nylon and cotton for textile use; tapestry, namely, wall hangings, of textile; fitted toilet lid covers of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Child cloth, namely, one-piece play suits; swimsuits; raincoat; footwear; wimples; gloves, namely, clothing; shower caps; mantillas; girdles; underpants; sashes for wear; layettes, namely, clothing; hats; hosiery; hairdressing capes; wedding cloth, namely, wedding dresses; masquerade costumes; sleep masks; Khatags in the form of scarves | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |