USPTO serial 87944829
IMAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A PLUMLEY
DAVID A PLUMLEY LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments; medical instruments and apparatus for orthopedic surgery, medical instruments and apparatus for trauma surgery; implants for trauma surgery of artificial materials; surgical implants of artificial materials; surgical special-purpose instruments for inserting implants; bone implants of artificial materials, spinal implants of artificial materials, medical guidewires, orthopedic articles for use in skeletal, spinal, joint and trauma surgery | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | Custom-manufacture of medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, custom-manufacture of surgical and orthopedic implants, manufacture of surgical special purpose instruments for inserting implants | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research, analysis, testing, design and development in the field of orthopedic surgery and bone implants for others and research and design relating thereto; Industrial analysis and research in the field of orthopedic surgery and bone implants for others; technical project planning in the field of orthopedic surgery and bone implants for others; technical project management in the field of orthopedic surgery and bone implants for others; development of surgical and orthopedic articles, development of implants and instruments for inserting implants; material development for manufacturing for others; material testing | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Medical services; Technical consultancy in the field of orthopedic surgery and bone implants for others; Providing of technical know-how, advice and information in the field of orthopedic surgery and bone implants for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Biedermann Technologies GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Biedermann Technologies GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named IMAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |