Drawing for INFECTONATOR

USPTO serial 87953586

INFECTONATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RISO, MARK E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFECTONATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curt Handley, Esquire

CURT HANDLEY, ESQUIRE LAW OFFICE OF CURT HANDLEY19540 BUCKINGHAM DR STE 1MOKENA, IL 60448UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing brain training games on-line and in mobile wireless form; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Production of video and computer game software; Providing companionship for playing games and cards; Providing a computer game for use network-wide by network users; Providing a web site through which people locate information about tournaments, events, and competitions in the video game field; Virtual reality arcade services; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer gamesACTIVENov 13, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 20, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 13, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 26, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 26, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 26, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 26, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 26, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 26, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 24, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 14, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 11, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance