Drawing for PETE THE PELICAN

USPTO serial 87984061

PETE THE PELICAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PETE THE PELICAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy S. Boczko

Jeremy S. Boczko HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Children's booksACTIVEOct 17, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 7, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2022SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 24, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 20, 2021IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 20, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2021EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 20, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 19, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2021IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2021INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jan 22, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 22, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 17, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 27, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 27, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 22, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance