USPTO serial 88007054
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Naresh Kilaru
NARESH KILARU FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer peripherals; computer networking hardware; Computer hardware for telecommunications; Computer memory hardware; Interconnected computer system in the nature of computer software and hardware for communicating between space-based assets and for controlling autonomous software-defined spacecraft for space exploration and space-based operational missions | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Modification services, namely, interchanging spacecraft assets to fulfill the roles of other spacecraft assets | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication services, namely, providing transmission of information in the nature of just-in-time connectivity and communications from any spacecraft element to any other spacecraft, enabling inter-spacecraft communications, and extra-spacecraft communications; communication services, namely, providing transmission and delivery of information via wireless communication networks in the nature of last-mile communications to a planetary surface | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications, and hosting computer software applications of others; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of accessing engineering, scientific, workload processing, and business applications remotely; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) cloud computing systems of others; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems; Providing a hosting platform for data virtualization and cloud computing; Providing a web hosting platform that features technology that enables the secure storage and exchange of information by users; Providing a web hosting platform that gives computer users the ability to access software, engineering, scientific, workload processing, and business applications remotely; Providing an on-line network environment that features technology that enables users to store and share data; Software as a Service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in accessing standard and custom engineering, scientific, workload processing, and business applications remotely; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; File sharing services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload and download electronic files; Planning, design and implementation of virtualization technologies for enterprises and businesses; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for deployment of software for collecting, processing, and analyzing data, and for supporting space exploration and space-based operational missions by controlling communications, cooperation, interoperability, and interchangeability of spacecraft | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |