USPTO serial 88007289
CONVERGIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONVERGIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pointe Claire Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing voice and mobility services, hosted PBX services, session initiation protocol (SIP) trunking services, ISDN primary rate interface (PRI) services, business phone line services, local and long distance phone line services, toll free phone line services, virtual number direct inward dialing (DID) services, mobile data plan services, mobile voice plan services; providing internet, data and networking services, fiber dedicated Internet services, business Internet services, multi-protocol label switching Internet Protocol (MPLS-IP) virtual private network (VPN) services, Ethernet virtual private line (EVPL) services; Internet cloud infrastructure services, server backup and recovery services; IP PBX services; IT professional services, network installation and support professional services, audio and Internet web conferencing services, Video as a Service (VaaS), short message service (SMS) services, efax services, electronic point-of-sale (ePOS) services | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2002 |
| 042 | Services for integrating and conforming with interoperability standards for Internet of Things (IoT) electronic devices, device connectivity platforms, device management platforms, application enablement platforms, enterprise software systems; services for fleet management, services for managing street lighting; Software as a Service (SaaS) that allows users of connected devices to access, share, configure, deliver, administer, maintain, control, monitor, secure and analyze data services and data sources through integration with commercial wireless communications network and third party solutions to route and transmit data between connected devices and enterprise applications, Internet hosted applications, mobile applications and data service platforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |