USPTO serial 88007377
IDENTPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDENTPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Troisdorf, DE
Troisdorf, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Industrial robots; Industrial mobile robots; Moving and handling equipment, namely, fork lifts, tele-handlers and lifts | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Scientific research and laboratory apparatus, educational apparatus and simulators, namely, electronic control systems and monitors for machines, engines, motors, moving and handling equipment, electronic tracking and monitoring systems, control systems for fork lifts, tele handlers and lifts; Apparatus, instruments and cables for electricity, namely, electricity conduits, transistors, signal splitters for electronic apparatus; Recorded content, namely, audio, video and laser recordings featuring information about warehouse layouts, data recordings featuring information about warehouse layouts; Devices for treatment using electricity, namely, electric transformers; Information technology and audio-visual equipment, namely, audio receivers, amplifiers, limiters, compressors, equalizers, optical information equipment; Measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers, namely, optical sensors, electrical sensors, laser measuring and detection devices, position detection instruments, optical detection and monitoring instruments, optical control instruments; Navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and map making devices, namely, localization devices, automatic identification systems, mobile devices capable of receiving wireless signals, immobile devices capable of receiving wireless signals, global positioning systems, laser localization systems, RFID and NFC and Barcode tracking systems, optical tracking systems, RFID and NFC and Barcode monitoring systems, optical monitoring systems, laser tracking and monitoring systems, map making devices for digital maps of warehouse layouts, map making devices for digital maps of storage system layouts; Optical devices, enhancers and correctors, namely, optical glasses, optical filters, laser devices; Safety, security, protection and signalling devices, namely, proximity sensors, position sensors, encoders, electric actuators | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | (Based on Intent to Use) Self-driving delivery robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) IT services, namely, providing technical support and help desk services for IT infrastructure architecture, operating systems, and database systems and web applications; Testing, authentication and quality control in the nature of product authentication, identification, testing and quality control for others; Science and technology services, namely, research and development of new products for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IdentPro GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by IdentPro GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IDENTPLUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |