USPTO serial 88007601
SMARTER DECISION. FASTER.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTER DECISION. FASTER.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Business predictive analytics software for collecting and analyzing data to facilitate business decision making | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 2017 |
| 035 | Providing business intelligence services; business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, sales, operation, product design particularly specializing in the use of predictive analytic models for the understanding and predicting of consumers, businesses, and market trends and actions | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 2017 |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable business predictive analytics software for collecting and analyzing data to facilitate business decision making | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2019 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2019 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |