USPTO serial 88035070
NOA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADEAU, MADELINE JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manuel R. Valcarcel, Esq.
Manuel R. Valcarcel, Esq. GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A.333 S.E. 2ND AVENUE, 44TH FLOORMIAMI, FL 33131United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, apparatus, instruments, and equipment for the viewing, detection, diagnosis, management and treatment of diseases, namely, macular degeneration; medical devices, apparatus, instruments, and equipment for the viewing, detection, diagnosis, management and treatment of eye conditions and diseases; medical devices, apparatus, instruments, and equipment for monitor progression of eye conditions and diseases and in particular for use in the detection and characterization of patients with age-related macular degeneration; and parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | Jun 8, 2021 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting a cloud-based platform that allows for uploading and analyzing test results; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software and proprietary algorithms for analyzing optical coherence tomography imaging | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2020 |
| 044 | Medical services, including vision care services and eye care services; provision of optical medical services, ophthalmic services, and ophthalmic diagnostic services; patient rehabilitation care services; provision of medical second opinions; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all of the aforementioned services; health care services, namely, providing interactive information services for health care professionals and patients; providing information relating to ophthalmic services and ophthalmic diagnostic services; providing a website and a database featuring medical information via online access to computer software and databases for use by medical and healthcare service providers and patients; providing interactive medical information services for receiving and providing patient-specific information to health care professionals | ACTIVE | Jun 8, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Notal Vision, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Notal Vision, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named NOA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2023 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 23, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |