USPTO serial 88042221
ONEBILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2022
- Examiner
- PULVERMACHER, TASHA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with ONEBILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc.
Houston, TX, US
Other trademarks owned by Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc.
HOUSTON, TX, US
MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS (HOUSTON) INC.
HOUSTON, TX, US
Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS (HOUSTON) INC.
MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS INC.
HOUSTON, TX, US
Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS INC.
MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS (HOUSTON) INC.
HOUSTON, TX, US
Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS (HOUSTON) INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARGARET A. BOULWARE
MARGARET A. BOULWARE BOULWARE & VALOIR2603 AUGUSTA DRSTE 1350HOUSTON, TX 77057Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing, namely, hosting a server featuring non-downloadable software on public and private clouds in the field of lift truck and material handling vehicle billing systems for sales and service, namely, software for use in generating bills for parts, service, and rental and for consolidation and standardization of invoices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LOGISNEXT AMERICAS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS (HOUSTON) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT AMERICAS (HOUSTON) INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONEBILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NRCS | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 18, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |