Drawing for HI BEAM

USPTO serial 88074102

HI BEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HISER, CHARLES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI BEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael S. Metteauer

Michael S. Metteauer Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical and surgical devices, namely, radiation therapy machines and related software sold as a unit; Mobile linear accelerators for intraoperative radiotherapyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 17, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 17, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 22, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 22, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 24, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 24, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 25, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 25, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 25, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 6, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 11, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 7, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 21, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 14, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance