Drawing for AERIS

USPTO serial 88095697

AERIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AERIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine Beaman Rankin

CHRISTINE BEAMAN RANKIN WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLPONE WEST FOURTH STREETWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in connection with autonomous vehicle sensing systems, namely, computer hardware and software for operating lidar apparatus, radar, proximity and camera sensor systems, motor vehicle collision avoidance systems and sensing systems that detect and classify objects on the road, comprised primarily of distance, optical sensors, radar apparatus, distance measuring, warning, and control apparatus, and speed measuring and control apparatus; Lidar apparatus; 3D depth sensors; Optical and proximity sensors; Sensor systems comprised of lidar apparatus, vision sensors, camera; Computer hardware systems for laser scanning for customization by users; Computer hardware systems for 3D scanning for customization by usersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 28, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 1, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 14, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 14, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 14, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 31, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance