USPTO serial 88105654
INTERTEK INTERPRET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 13, 2019
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with INTERTEK INTERPRET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the analysis of hydrocarbon feed streams in a blending facility, such as a refinery, for assessment and modelling of composition of a hydrocarbon blend; downloadable computer software for use in the analysis of hydrocarbon feed streams in a blending facility, such as a refinery, for assessment and modelling of composition of a hydrocarbon blend | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Testing and analysis of hydrocarbon feed streams in a blending facility such as a refinery; testing and analysis services for the assessment and modelling of composition of a hydrocarbon blend; scientific laboratory services; computer services of the nature of Software as a Service (SaaS), namely, hosting computer software and software-utilizing services for access by, downloading by, use by others for use in the analysis of hydrocarbon feed streams in a blending facility, such as a refinery, for assessment and modelling of composition of a hydrocarbon blend; computer services of the nature of Software as a Service (SaaS), namely, hosting software for use by others in the analysis of hydrocarbon feed streams in a blending facility, such as a refinery, for assessment and modelling of organic deposition from a hydrocarbon blend; leasing of computer software for use in the analysis of hydrocarbon feed streams in a blending facility, such as a refinery, for assessment and modelling of composition of a hydrocarbon blend; advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intertek Group Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Intertek Group Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Intertek Group Plc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTERTEK INTERPRET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |