USPTO serial 88106134
ZIRUMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JEANIE H
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIRUMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
Wilmington, AZ
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth Motolenich-Salas
KENNETH MOTOLENICH-SALAS MOTOSALAS LAW, PLLC16210 NORTH 63RD STREETSCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Table cutlery, namely , knives, forks, and spoons made of wood | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Wooden basting spoons; Wooden kitchen brushes, namely, dishwashing brushes, crumb brushes, cleaning brushes for barbecue grills, cleaning brushes for household use, basting brushes, and cake brushes; Covers for dishes made of wood for kitchen use; Wooden dinnerware, namely, plates, bowls, cups and saucers made of wood; Wooden covers for dishes; Wooden dishes; Wooden kitchen containers; Wooden kitchen utensils, namely, cooking spoons, mixing spoons, slotted spoons, salad tongs, and serving forks; Wooden mortars for kitchen use; Wooden pestles for kitchen use; Wooden nutcrackers; Wooden trivets; Wooden salad tongs; Wooden dessert servers; Wooden serving ladles; Wooden table napkin holders or rings; Wooden tableware, namely, coffee services and tea services; Wooden tea bag rests; Wooden trays for domestic purposes; Wooden vegetable dishes being serving platters; Wooden cooking spoons; Wooden toothpicks; Wooden grilling planks, namely, wood cooking planks for use in grilling | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Jigsaw and manipulative puzzles; Wooden toy building blocks; Wooden nested toy figures; Wooden nested toy dolls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DO IT WISER, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Wiser Toys LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Wiser Toys LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ZIRUMA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |