USPTO serial 88116071
ELEMENT AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEMENT AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer technology consultancy services; computer technology consultancy services in the nature of software development and computer modeling services in the field of artificial intelligence technology solutions and software products for data analysis, pattern discovery, process automation, contextual prediction, predictive analytics, predictive modelling, recognition, segmentation, regression, decision support and visualization; providing artificial intelligence based data analysis, pattern discovery, process automation, contextual prediction, predictive analytics, predictive modelling, recognition, segmentation, regression, decision support and visualization services; Research, development, design, technical consulting and maintenance of business software; Computer software design and updating, computer software design for others; design and development of software; design and development of computer interfaces; design and development of software architectures; software as a service (SAAS) provider; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of artificial intelligence based software products for data analysis, pattern discovery, process automation, contextual prediction, predictive analysis, predictive modelling, recognition, classification, segmentation and visualization of all sectors of business data; artificial intelligence (AI) as a service (AIAAS) provider; artificial intelligence (AI) as a service (AIAAS) provider in the field of artificial intelligence based software products for data analysis, pattern discovery, process automation, contextual prediction, predictive analysis, predictive modelling, recognition, classification, segmentation and visualization of all sectors of business data; technological consulting; technological consulting in the field of artificial intelligence; research and development; research and development in the field of artificial intelligence; development of standards for others in the field of artificial intelligence; implementation of standards for others in the field of artificial intelligence; evaluation of the standards of others in the field of artificial intelligence; facilitation services relating to the development and setting of standards in the field of artificial intelligence; consulting services relating to the development and setting of standards in the field of artificial intelligence, including explainable AI (XAI); computer security services; development of security systems and contingency planning for information systems; computer security consultancy services; internet security consultancy services; computer network security services; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; design and development of electronic data security systems; computer security consultancy; systems of intelligence; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of computer software for document management; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of computer programmes for document analysis and processing in the field of insurance; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of network security software; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of computer software for ensuring data integrity, data authenticity; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of security software for mobile electronic devices; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of electronic mail security software; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of computer software for pilot assistance systems; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of computer software for processing digital images, digital signal processing, proximity sensors for crash detection and for the automated control of motor vehicle steering systems and motor vehicle braking systems; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of computer software for logistics; electronic document authentication services; digitization of documents; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |