USPTO serial 88124068
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. Manchel
Brett A. Manchel GOLDMAN LAW GROUP1300 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W.; STE. 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Grain-based Beverages; beverages, namely, cocoa-based beverages, coffee-based beverages, herbal tea beverages; coffee; tea; ketchup, relish, chutney, mustard; Hemp-based food products derived from cannabis that has a delta-9 THC concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis, namely, hemp-based baked goods in the nature of cookies; hemp-based cakes containing cannabis that has a delta-9 THC concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis, candy bars, granola, flours; hemp-based mixes for baked goods derived from cannabis that has a delta-9 THC concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis, namely, mixes for cakes, brownies, cupcakes, cookies and muffins, pancake mixes; ready-to-eat breakfast cereals, breakfast cereals, cereal bars, cereal-based snack food, and condiments; Chocolate, chocolates, chocolate confectionery, sugar confectionery, candies and biscuits, all containing hemp that has a delta-9 THC concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis; Candies; sugar confectionery; chocolate confectionery; cereal-based energy bars; baked goods, namely, cakes, cereal bars, biscuits, muffins, cupcakes, brownies, cookies; mixes for baked goods, namely, mixes for cakes, brownies, cupcakes, cookies and muffins, pancake mixes; granola-based snack food and bars; cereal-based snack food; rice-based snack food; non-alcoholic tea-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer; Hemp-based beverages derived from cannabis that has a delta-9 THC concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis; water and fruit based beverages containing cannabinoids derived from cannabis that has a delta-9 THC concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis; Fruit-flavored beverages, non-alcoholic honey-based beverages, non-alcoholic carbonated beverages, carbonated soft drinks; non-dairy soy beverages not being milk substitutes, energy drinks; drinking water; sparkling water; flavored water | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring Sale of hemp products derived from cannabis that has a delta-9 THC concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis and accessories thereof; Retail store services featuring sale of food products; Retail store services featuring sale of beverages; online retail sales of hemp-based beverages and snacks derived from cannabis that has a delta-9 THC concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |