USPTO serial 88147142
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Britt L. Anderson
Britt L. Anderson PERKINS COIE LLP3150 PORTER DRIVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platforms for artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning, namely, software that contains learning algorithms that continuously analyze data; downloadable artificial intelligence software for facilitating interaction and communication between humans and artificial intelligence platforms for use in customer service, human resources, accounting, purchasing, research and development, information technology, logistics, facilities management, and sales and marketing; downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for automation of customer service; downloadable software incorporating machine learning for simulating conversation with humans via the internet; downloadable software for facilitating interaction and communication between humans and artificial intelligence platforms; downloadable computer software for facilitating interaction and communication between humans and artificial intelligence platforms for digital virtual agents, intelligence agents, natural language processing, and business automation used to support customer service, human resources, accounting, purchasing, research and development, information technology, logistics, facilities management, and sales and marketing; downloadable software for management, automation, and recording of customer service and sales; downloadable software for use in management of customer and user inquiries through websites; downloadable computer software for use in management of online chat communications with customers; downloadable software for cloning artificial intelligence personalities | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning for business data analysis; providing online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for automation of customer service; providing non-downloadable software for facilitating interaction between humans and machines; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for simulating conversation with humans via the internet; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for facilitating interaction and communication between humans and artificial intelligence platforms; providing online nondownloadable software for facilitating interaction and communication between humans and artificial intelligence platforms used for digital virtual agents, intelligence agents, natural language processing, and business automation; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software used for management, automation, and recording of customer service and sales; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in management of customer and user inquiries through websites; providing online non-downloadable software for use in management of online chat communications with customers; providing online non-downloadable software for cloning artificial intelligence personalities; computer software development; design, programming and maintenance of artificial intelligence software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |