USPTO serial 88156556
EVOLUTION BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVOLUTION BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Vancouver, BC, CA
North Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terence P. O'Brien
Terence P. O'Brien Amer Sports Americas130 East Randolph Street, Suite 600Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | avalanche rescue equipment, namely, avalanche airbags; life-saving apparatus and life-saving equipment consisting of an airbag inflated through a battery-operated air blower, and structural and replacement parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; protective backpacks, each with integrated avalanche rescue equipment in the nature of integrated avalanche airbags | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | bags, namely, backpacks, sports bags, messenger bags, duffle bags, book bags, tote bags, travel bags, waist bags, toiletry bags sold empty; climbing equipment, namely, chalk bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, casual wear in the form of tops and bottoms, athletic wear in the form of tops and bottoms, jackets, coats, vests, pants, shorts, overalls, skirts, skorts, dresses, shirts, pullovers, sweaters, T-shirts, tank tops, hooded sweatshirts, baselayer shirts and pants, underwear; ski and snowboard clothing, namely, tops and bottoms; climbing clothing, namely, tops and bottoms; clothing accessories, namely, gloves, mittens, neck gaiters, scarves, socks, belts; headwear, namely, hats, caps, toques, beanies, visors, headbands, balaclavas; footwear, namely, boots, shoes, boot and shoe liners; climbing footwear; mountaineering footwear; hiking footwear; ski and snowboard footwear; thermal insulation clothing, namely, tops and bottoms made of nonwoven synthetic fibers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | climbing equipment, namely, harnesses, slings, knee protectors, crack protection equipment, namely, nuts and cams; mountaineering and rock climbing equipment, namely, safety harnesses; climbing bags being bags for climbers specially adapted for holding climbing equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring clothing, clothing accessories, headwear, footwear, thermal insulation for use in clothing, bags, climbing equipment, avalanche airbags, protective backpacks featuring avalanche airbags; online retail store services featuring clothing, clothing accessories, headwear, footwear, thermal insulation for use in clothing, bags, climbing equipment, avalanche airbags, protective backpacks featuring avalanche airbags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amer Sports Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amer Sports Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named EVOLUTION BY DESIGN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |