Drawing for REIGNING PHO

USPTO serial 88161938

REIGNING PHO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REIGNING PHO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne Boisineau

LYNNE BOISINEAU BOISINEAU LAW16478 BEACH BLVD., SUITE 347WESTMINSTER, CA 92683UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion; Administration of the business affairs of franchises; Advice in the running of establishments as franchises; Business management advisory services relating to franchising; Restaurant franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 11, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance