Drawing for MONSTER ROCK

USPTO serial 88234205

MONSTER ROCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER ROCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeanine M. Mitchell

Jeanine M. Mitchell Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer game software for gambling machines; downloadable computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; games that accept virtual or monetary wagers sold as a feature of game software; downloadable computer software and firmware for playing games of chance on any computerized platform, including dedicated gaming consoles, video based slot machines, reel based slot machines, video lottery terminals, hand held devices, mobile and wireless communication devices, and internet enabled devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 29, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 28, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 25, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 25, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 11, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 11, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 11, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 21, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 16, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 21, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance