USPTO serial 88252101
SINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Struthers
James F. Struthers RICHARD LAW GROUP13355 NOEL RD STE 1350DALLAS, TX 75240UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for streaming audio and music; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for broadcasting, streaming, recording, displaying and viewing vocal performances; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for broadcasting, streaming, displaying and viewing song lyrics; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for creating, broadcasting, streaming, displaying and viewing avatars; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for creating, broadcasting, streaming, displaying and viewing virtual vocalists and audiences; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for performing online karaoke; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for performing virtual karaoke; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for an online vocal performance platform; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for connecting vocal performers with audiences; software as service (SaaS) featuring software for messaging; software as service (SaaS) featuring software for displaying emoticons; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for generating audio and video effects; rental of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 21, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |