Drawing for BAD BOYS

USPTO serial 88252602

BAD BOYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAD BOYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GRANT R. CLAYTON

GRANT R. CLAYTON CLAYTON HOWARTH, P.C.PO BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091-1909UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail services for outfitting intermediate to expert level bow hunters featuring specialized archery hunting equipment in the nature of highly specialized hunting arrows, not sold at retail store locations, equipped with radio transmitters for use in locating wounded animals, hunting arrow shaft inserts with radio transmitters for use in locating wounded animals, hunting arrows equipped with weighted penetrations allowing an archer to aim an arrow equipped with a penetrator using a bow that has been sighted for the arrow without the penetrator, weighted penetrations for arrow shafts allowing an archer to aim an arrow equipped with a penetrator using a bow that has been sighted for the arrow without the penetrator, radio receivers for use in locating animals wounded with hunting arrows, hunting arrows having internal compartments for receiving payloads and hunting arrow shaft inserts having compartments for receiving payloads, hunting arrow shaft inserts having compartments for receiving payloads, the aforementioned sold specifically to bow hunters through online retail and not via retail storesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 22, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 22, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 9, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 27, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 6, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 6, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 6, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 6, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance