USPTO serial 88256964
MUTHA DUKKAH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUTHA DUKKAH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Olive oil for food; walnut oil for food; avocado oil for food; coconut oil for food; peanut oil for food; sesame oil for food; vegetable oil for cooking; fruit-based snack bars; fruit-based snack food; nut-based snack mixes; snack food dips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Condiment mixes in the nature of food seasonings and snack food dips comprised of spices, processed and dried herbs, processed nuts, and processed seeds used as a flavoring for foods; cereal-based snack food; cereal-based bars; granola-based snack bars; granola-based snack food; rice-based snack food; snack crackers; confectionery, namely, chocolate confectionery, fruit-based confectionery, peanut confectionery and almond confectionery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |