USPTO serial 88261177
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caitlin R. Byczko
Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 S.Meridian St.Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for hybrid cloud management and comparison, namely, recorded or downloadable computer software for managing and comparing hybrid cloud environments by analyzing and determining usage workloads and data and cloud spending across all major public and private cloud environments; Computer programs, namely, recorded or downloadable computer software programs used to provide an intelligent cloud management platform to build, manage, and optimize hybrid cloud environments for others | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2016 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable application delivery software used for deploying, accelerating, automating, analyzing, monitoring, managing, configuring, reporting on, optimizing, and securing software applications located in a multi-cloud environment; technical support services in the nature of cloud migration assistance, namely, data migration services, Migration of datacenter, server and database applications for others; Software as a service (SAAS) services for hybrid cloud management and comparison featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for managing and comparing hybrid cloud environments by analyzing and determining usage workloads and data and cloud spending across all major public and private cloud environments; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for conducting data backup and cloud migration; Cloud migration, namely, Data migration services, Migration of datacenter, server and database applications for others; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software for use in managing and monitoring of cloud computing resources, for use in deploying software applications and software platforms to computing cloud environments, for use in evaluating, provisioning and allocating computer software and hardware resources among various computing cloud environments, for use in configuring cloud security settings and cloud firewalls, for use in creating and managing policies and access controls used for cloud governance and security, and for use in enabling software development in a cloud computing environment; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software used for proactive cost management by providing cost management visualization information to compare hybrid cloud providers; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software used for cloud governance and security by creating, issuing and enforcing consistent access policies and access controls across all public and private cloud environments; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in controlling, analyzing and managing Internet exchange point connectivity, cloud network security, software application delivery, cloud data storage and private cloud utility functionality; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in analyzing, evaluating and conducting unified expense management with single sign-on of multi-cloud environments; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in analyzing, evaluating, reporting on, and managing consolidated cloud consumption across all public and private cloud environments; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in monitoring and managing hybrid cloud infrastructure and platforms; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in monitoring of software applications hosted in private or public cloud environments; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring temporary use of a non-downloadable intelligent cloud management software platform that builds, manages, and optimizes hybrid cloud environments for others | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2016 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |