USPTO serial 88278774
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi Tandy
Heidi Tandy Berger Singerman, LLP1450 Brickell AveSuite 1900Miami, FL 33131| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for translation; downloadable software for localization of translated wording | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for translation; providing online non-downloadable software for localization of translated wording; Providing quality assurance services in the field of language translation, namely, assessment, analysis, and evaluation of third party translations and translation services to determine conformity with industry standards for translation; Providing quality assurance services in the field of language translation, namely, assessment, analysis, and evaluation of third party translations of websites to determine conformity with industry standards for translation; Providing quality assurance services in the field of language translation, namely, assessment, analysis, and evaluation of third party translations of digital content to determine conformity with industry standards for translation; Providing quality assurance services in the field of language translation, verifying and assessing the translation of the digital content and software of others to see if it is linguistically and culturally relevant and appropriate to the target market to determine conformity with industry standards for translation; providing online non-downloadable software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, software for use by others for enabling multi-language translation of content, for assessing and verifying the accuracy of translation services and third-party translations, for assessment of third-party websites for translation purposes, for assessment of third-party digital content for translation purposes and for verification and assessment of localization services, namely, verifying and assessing the digital content and software of others to see if it is linguistically and culturally relevant and appropriate to the target market | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2021 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2019 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |