USPTO serial 88295764
LIVING LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MISCHLER, MEGAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVING LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olaf Kretzschmar
LEVEL 32, 200 GEORGE STREETSYDNEY, 2000AUSTRALIAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewellery; Jewellery and imitation jewellery; Jewellery cases; Jewellery chains; Jewellery, including imitation jewellery and plastic jewellery; Amulets; Imitation jewellery; Necklaces; Pearls | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household containers for foods; Household plastic gloves; Household scouring pads; Household utensils, namely, graters; Household utensils, namely, sieves; Household utensils, namely, spatulas; Household utensils, namely, strainers; Household utensils, namely, turners; Atomizers for household use; Cages for household pets; Colanders for household use; Containers for household use; Gloves for household purposes; Graters for household purposes; Holders for household irons; Loofahs for household purposes; Plastic household gloves; Scrapers for household purposes; Strainers for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2019 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 17, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |