USPTO serial 88320835
QUINLAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2020
- Examiner
- KUHN, RIO NICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with QUINLAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Hyde Park, NY, US
New Hyde Park, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY E BENNETT
ANTHONY E BENNETT HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP6900 JERICHO TPKSYOSSET, NY 11791United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pretzels | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | BRNT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION ISSUED - REEXAMINATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | BRPI | PROCEEDING INSTITUTED - REEXAMINATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | BPXR | ASSIGNED TO REX/EXP PROCEEDING STAFF | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | BPET | NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF E/R PETITION TO REGISTRANT'S EMAIL | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | BPPR | PETITION FOR REEXAMINATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 19, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |