Drawing for FORTH

USPTO serial 88322223

FORTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter A. Chiabotti

Peter A. Chiabotti Akerman LLP777 S. Flagler DriveSuite 1100, West TowerWest Palm Beach, FL 33401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin and body care products, namely, lotions, creams, salves, balms, moisturizers, cleansers, non-medicated dissolvable strips being breath freshening preparations for personal hygiene, and oils for cosmetic use; electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of essential oils; all of the forgoing goods containing CBD derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basisACTIVE—
034Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils; electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of propylene glycol; electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of vegetable glycerin; all of the forgoing goods containing CBD derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2023EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2023EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 12, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2023EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2023EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 11, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 25, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 12, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 12, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 12, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 28, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 31, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 31, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance