USPTO serial 88322588
EHUNGRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EHUNGRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application, namely, software for use by restaurants and other food service providers in facilitating the processing of online food orders, and for tracking and analyzing information about online orders and customers | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2009 |
| 035 | E-commerce services, namely, providing electronic processing and reporting of online orders for others; Providing order management services, namely, electronic processing of orders for restaurants and other food service providers; Computerized online ordering services and electronic processing of orders for others in the field of restaurants and other food service providers; Online ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2009 |
| 042 | Software as a service (saas) services featuring software for restaurants and other food service providers to offer, facilitate, manage, track, and fulfill online orders; Providing websites featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software, namely, software for use in facilitating the advertising and marketing of restaurants and other food service providers, for displaying online menus, for facilitating online orders, for restaurants to manage customer online order information, and for assisting restaurants and other food service providers in tracking their customers, online orders, and finances; Application service provider (asp) featuring software for use by restaurants and food service providers to accept online orders from customers; Software as a service (saas) services featuring software for use by restaurants and food service providers to assist with promoting online business growth and building customer relationships; Software as a service (saas) services featuring software for providing a platform for online restaurant and food service provider ordering and advertising; Software as a service (saas) services featuring non-downloadable software for use in the food service industry for enabling, facilitating, and processing online orders for restaurants and other food service providers, managing and organizing online orders for restaurants and other food service providers, and customer relationship management and marketing; Software as a service (saas) services featuring software for facilitating online order processing and sales transactions between food service providers and and customers; Designing, creating, maintaining and hosting online food service websites for others; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |