USPTO serial 88323778
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Shenzhen Ruixinlong Technology Co.,Ltd.
Longgang Dist,Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Ruixinlong Technology Co.,Ltd.
Shenzhen Ruixinlong Technology Co.,Ltd.
Longgang Dist,Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Ruixinlong Technology Co.,Ltd.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Baskets for household purposes; Beer glasses; Bread baskets for household purposes; Cookie molds; Cruet stands made of precious metals; Disposable table plates; Drinking flasks; Fruit bowls; Heat-insulated containers for household use; Ironing boards; Lunchboxes; Napkin holders; Non-electric kettles; Sponges for household purposes; Tea sets; Wash basins in the nature of bowls | ACTIVE | Feb 16, 2019 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | ISCO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |