Drawing for CHARLOTTE'S WEB

USPTO serial 88329062

CHARLOTTE'S WEB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARLOTTE'S WEB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JUDD LAUTER

JUDD LAUTER COOLEY LLP3175 HANOVER STREETPALO ALTO, CA 94043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements; dietary and nutritional supplements containing hemp extracts derived from cannabis sativa L. with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basisACTIVEDec 20, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 18, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 1, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 11, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 10, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 9, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 14, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance