USPTO serial 88329902
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. O'Brien
Sean D. O'Brien Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP111 S.W. Fifth AvenueSuite 3400Portland, OR 97204| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | seed-based snack bars also containing dried fruits, nuts and chocolate, fruit and nut based snack bars, fruit based snack bars, nut based snack bars, nuts and seeds based snack bars, processed chia seeds for human consumption, processed edible seeds, not being seasonings or flavorings namely, milled chia seeds for human consumption; processed flax seeds, not being seasonings or flavorings; all the foregoing being comprised in whole or significant part of organic ingredients | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Breakfast cereals, cereal-based ready to eat food bars, pancake mixes, toaster pastries, granola based bars, oatmeal, hot oatmeal mixes, waffles, granola, bread, muesli, cookies, breakfast biscuits, popcorn, chocolate bark containing granola, processed cereal in the nature of processed Khorasan wheat grain puffs, processed cereal in the nature of rice puffs, steel cut oats, rolled oats; all the foregoing being comprised in whole or significant part of organic ingredients | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |