Drawing for PERCEPTUAL DISPLAY PLATFORM

USPTO serial 88337957

PERCEPTUAL DISPLAY PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERCEPTUAL DISPLAY PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software and hardware for use in wide range of digital display devices, namely, digital tablets, mobile phones, laptops, and automotive, marine, and avionic display systems and digital signs, for adapting the content characteristics being displayed, namely, color and contrast perception, significantly improving readability across all ambient light conditions and reducing eyestrain to increase readability and visibility when viewing content, namely, video, images and advertisements on digital display devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 10, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 10, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 27, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 27, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 27, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 27, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 10, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 22, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 22, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 22, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 22, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 22, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 8, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 29, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 1, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 16, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance