USPTO serial 88338506
IDROPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDROPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VICTOR K SAPPHIRE
VICTOR K SAPPHIRE LAW OFFICE OF VICTOR SAPPHIRE7190 SUNSET BLVD , STE 116LOS ANGELES, CA 90046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Eye drops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |