Drawing for MOJO TECH

USPTO serial 88361248

MOJO TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MOJO TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Seth Bayles

10175 W TWAIN AVE #130LAS VEGAS, NV 89117UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of essential oilsACTIVE
009Electronic cigarette batteries; Batteries for electronic cigarettes; Chargers for electronic cigarettes; Electric coils for electronic cigarettesACTIVE
034Electronic cigarette atomizers sold empty; Electronic cigarette boxes; Electronic cigarette cases; Electronic cigarette holders; Electronic cigarette lanyards; Electronic cigarette lighters; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of propylene glycol; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of vegetable glycerin; Electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty; Electronic cigarettes; Electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers for smokers; Electronic cigarettes for use as an alternative to traditional cigarettes; Boxes for electronic cigarettes and electronic cigarette accessories; Cartomizers, namely, combination electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty and atomizers, sold as a component of electronic cigarettes; Cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; Cartridges sold filled with propylene glycol for electronic cigarettes; Cartridges sold filled with vegetable glycerin for electronic cigarettes; Cases for electronic cigarettes and electronic cigarette accessories; Chemical flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Electric cigarettes; Flavorings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; Liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; Mechanical electronic cigarettesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 27, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 1, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 1, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 24, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2019EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Jun 14, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jun 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 16, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 1, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance