USPTO serial 88366962
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ji'an, Jiangxi, CN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shiyong Ye
250 W 34th StreetOne Penn Plaza, Suite 2015New York, NY 10119| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | 3D scanners; 3D spectacles; Acoustic sound alarms; Adapter plugs; Aerial combiners; Aerials; Audio recorders; Automatic indicators of low pressure in tires; Battery chargers; Bicycle helmets; Bicycle speedometers; Boom boxes; Capacitive styluses for touch screen devices; Car video recorders; Carrying cases, holders, protective cases and stands featuring power supply connectors, adaptors, speakers and battery charging devices, specially adapted for use with handheld digital electronic devices, namely, cell phones, pc tablet; Computer peripheral devices; Contact lenses; Converters for electric plugs; Data cables; Diving suits; Electric contacts; Electric navigational instruments; Electrical cables; Electrical plugs and sockets; Electronic book reader; Electronic locks; Eyeglasses; Fingerprint scanners; Fitted plastic films known as skins for covering and providing a scratch proof barrier or protection for electronic devices, namely, MP3 players, mobile telephones, smart telephones, digital cameras, global positioning systems and personal digital assistants; Galvanic cells; Global positioning system (GPS) consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers, and network interface devices; Headphones; Infrared cameras; Infrared detection apparatus; Keyboards; PC tablet mounts; PC tablets; Plug-in connectors; Plumb levels; Protective films adapted for computer screens; Protective films adapted for smartphones; Safety and driving assistant system for mobile vehicles and vessels comprised of electronic proximity sensors and switches, high-resolution cameras, integrated circuits for the purpose of imaging processing, and display monitors; Smart watches; Smartglasses; Solar batteries; Sport whistles; Surveyors' levels; Switches, electric; Telescopes; Transmitters of electronic signals; USB cables; Wireless computer peripherals; Wireless electronic visitor chimes; Wireless headsets for smartphones; Wireless chargers; Wires, electric; Signal whistles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2020 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2019 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |