USPTO serial 88370528
BABYBLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, ALINA S.
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABYBLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Futian Dist,Shenzhen, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer operating programs, recorded; Downloadable computer operating programs; Downloadable computer programs for user interface design; Downloadable interactive multimedia computer game programs; Downloadable computer programs for network management; Downloadable computer programs for project management ;computer software for facilitating and completing money transfers via email, mobile devices and global and local computer networks; computer software for collecting, analyzing and reporting business related data and information, namely, software for creating and reporting of business analytics relating to payment processing, authentication, and tracking; Computer hardware and software for making and processing payment transactions and user authentication in connection with credit cards, debit cards, gift cards, pre-paid cards, and other payment forms ;electronic devices, namely, credit card readers, electronic card readers, computer chip card readers, point of sale terminals, and related hardware and software, all for accepting, effecting, enabling, facilitating, processing, operating, authenticating users and managing payment transactions via mobile devices and local and global communications networks; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via mobile devices, and local and global computer networks; computer software for use in issuing and providing receipts for others for electronic payments and payment transactions; computer application software for mobile phones and handheld computers, namely, software that allows consumers to make mobile payments to merchants; computer hardware and software for collecting, analyzing, and providing data and information regarding electronic payment transactions; computer software for facilitating mobile payments, and enabling consumers to use their electronic signature, personal identification number (pin), name or photo in completing mobile payment transactions; computer software for issuing receipts regarding mobile payment transactions; computer software for use in issuing invoices and collecting payment amounts due; computer software for facilitating and managing merchant-customer communications, and providing payment transaction information; computer software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for use in database management, as a spreadsheet, word processing, and, if software is content- or field-specific, the content or field of use ;Downloadable computer software, namely, an electronic financial platform that accommodates multiple types of payment and debt transactions in an integrated mobile phone, PDA, and web-based environment | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |