USPTO serial 88436295
VIDYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter HAUG PARTNERS, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medical and veterinary preparations and articles; diagnostic preparations and materials; test strips for diagnostics; medical reagents for testing; pharmaceutical preparations and therapeutics; vitamins and minerals; dietetic supplements for medical use; dietary supplements; Scientific equipment; apparatus for measuring and recording information; apparatus for transmitting information electronically; Scientific research and laboratory apparatus, educational apparatus and simulators; Measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers (other than medical); data processing apparatus; data storage apparatus; apparatus and instruments for the analysis of data; data transmitters; microchips; accessories for the aforesaid goods; Apparatus for carrying out diagnostic tests; medical diagnostic testing apparatus for point of care and domestic use; lateral flow tests; test media for diagnostics; disposable testing apparatus and components for receiving saliva and other bodily fluids; accessories for the aforesaid goods; Insurance services; information and consultancy relating to the provision of insurance services; Medical services; Human healthcare services; provision of information relating to prevention, diagnosis, treatment and identification of medical disease or genetic disorder; medical and health services relating to genetic testing; telemedicine services; counselling and therapy services; pharmacy advice and services; dispensing of medicines; consultancy, advice and information related to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |