Drawing for ITEMVISION

USPTO serial 88456569

ITEMVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OAKES, JEFFREY ALLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITEMVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Holly M. Lar

702 SW 8TH STREET, MS 0125BENTONVILLE, AR 72716-0215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software, mobile phone software and smartphone software that enables accurate recognition of a product and price information and the adding of a product to an electronic shopping cart via computer vision; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, a computer vision system designed to allow the accurate recognition of products in mobile and embedded devices; Downloadable computer software for inventory controlACTIVE
042Software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for use in providing retail and ordering services for a wide variety of consumer goodsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 6, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 6, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 6, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 19, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 19, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 12, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 18, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 18, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 18, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 6, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance