USPTO serial 88483762
HEMP VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEMP VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angela S. Kalsi
ANGELA S. KALSI AMIN TALATI WASSERMAN LLP100 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body and beauty care cosmetics; cosmetic preparations for body care; body lotions; body creams; bath soaps; essential oils; bath oil; body oil; hair oil; hair lotions; shampoos; hair conditioners; non-medicated skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; protein dietary supplements; meal replacement drinks; hemp seed protein powder; plant-based protein powder; hemp protein used as a nutritional ingredient in various powdered and ready-to-drink beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Processed edible seeds, namely, hemp seeds and chia seeds; edible oils; coconut oil; hemp oil; hemp seed oil; coconut spread; nut spreads; processed coconut; shortening; hemp botanical extracts; nut-based food bars; seed-based food bars; nut-based snacks; seed-based snacks; hemp milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flour; sugar; candy | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed edible seeds, namely, hemp seeds and chia seeds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutiva
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named HEMP VALLEY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |