USPTO serial 88514048
NERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGER, MELANIE ALYSSA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J Bellus
Stewart J Bellus COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | 3D printing machinery, namely, 3D printers, 3D printing pens; 3D printers; machines for processing workpieces in the nature of parts for bicycles, parts for motorcycles, parts for mopeds, parts for motorized bicycles, and parts for electric bicycles using additive manufacturing in the nature of 3D printing; computer controlled, power-operated machines for manufacturing physical models of a computer-generated graphic model of motorcycle parts, moped parts, bicycle parts, motorized bicycle parts, and electric bicycle parts by means of material deposition processes; machines for additive manufacturing in the nature of 3D printing; robotic machines for additive manufacturing in the nature of 3D printing; Industrial robots; motor rollers, namely, road rollers, roller conveyors, printing rollers, rollers for rotary printing machines; electrical powered rollers, namely, road rollers, roller conveyors, printing rollers, rollers for rotary printing machines; rollers, namely road rollers, roller conveyors, printing rollers, rollers for rotary printing machines; engines for land crafts in the nature of motorcycles, mopeds, bicycles, motorized bicycles, and electric bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land crafts, namely, motorcycles, mopeds, bicycles, motorized bicycles, and electric bicycles; motorcycles; multi-track land crafts, namely, all-terrain motorcycles, mopeds, bicycles, motorized bicycles, and electric bicycles; bicycles; motorized bicycles; e-bikes, namely, electric bicycles; mopeds; motor rollers, namely, roller chains for motorcycles, mopeds, bicycles, motorized bicycles, and electric bicycles; electrical powered rollers, namely, roller chains for motorcycles, mopeds, bicycles, motorized bicycles, and electric bicycles; rollers, namely, roller chains for motorcycles, mopeds, bicycles, motorized bicycles, and electric bicycles; pedal propelled land crafts, namely, bicycles; power propelled land crafts in the nature of motorcycles, mopeds, motorized bicycles, electric bicycles; all of the foregoing being made by 3D printing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |